Two platforms built for working stylists. One is the established, invite-only veteran; the other adds the client experience at open pricing. An honest, side-by-side look, updated September 2026.
GoodPix and Stylement are both purpose-built for professional personal stylists, not salon chairs. They overlap on the core: branded client apps, closets, lookbooks, and invoicing. GoodPix is the established, invite-only, peer-referred option aimed at high-volume practices, and it does not publish what it charges. Stylement covers the same core and adds the client-facing layer GoodPix leaves out, color analysis, travel styling, and a keepsake, at open pricing from $49 a month.
| Stylement | GoodPix | |
|---|---|---|
| Built for personal stylists | Yes | Yes |
| Branded client home | Yes, your name on the studio clients log into | Yes, branded client apps |
| Digital closets | Yes | Yes |
| Lookbooks | Yes, Atelier editor plus a delivered keepsake | Yes, lookbooks |
| Invoicing and payments | Yes, card with optional deposits and a cancellation policy | Yes, invoicing |
| Fitting management | Not a named feature | Yes |
| Shopping commissions | Yes, built-in affiliate links | Yes, commission earning up to 25% |
| 12-season color analysis | Yes, plus an in-store Delta-E scanner | Not offered |
| Travel styling | Yes, Valise trip briefs and packing | Not offered |
| Client keepsake | Yes, a passport that earns stamps | Not offered |
| Receipt-to-closet sync | Yes, forward a receipt to your studio address | Not described in public materials |
| Multiple stylists / studio team | Yes, studio-team model with per-seat billing | Yes, a team tier up to 10 users; price not published |
| Access | Open signup | Invite-only |
| Public pricing | Yes, from $49/mo | Not published; shared during the consult |
GoodPix details from public materials as of September 2026. Not described means absent from GoodPix’s public materials, not a statement that the tool cannot do it. GoodPix listed figures in its public FAQ as recently as June 2026; they are no longer published there and its pricing page now sits behind a login, so no numbers are quoted for it here.
You want the operations layer from an established, invite-only platform, and you run a high-touch signature-service or group-membership practice. GoodPix describes itself as the operating system for the profession, and that is a fair account of its strength: fitting management, commissions up to 25%, and a team tier, aimed at stylists who have already scaled. A consult before you see a price is not an obstacle for you.
You want the client-facing layer GoodPix does not have, color analysis, travel styling, and a keepsake, plus pricing you can read before you talk to anyone, from $49 a month, and no invite gate to get started. A studio-team model is there when you grow.
Both are purpose-built stylist platforms with closets, lookbooks, and invoicing. GoodPix builds the operations layer and is strong at it. Stylement builds that too, and adds the part your client keeps: color analysis, travel styling, and a passport that earns stamps. If you are already scaled and value an established platform over color and travel, GoodPix is a good choice; if the client moment and a published price matter, Stylement.
GoodPix does not publish prices. Its pricing page sits behind a login and its public FAQ no longer lists figures, so a number is shared with you during the consult. Stylement publishes its pricing from $49 a month with open signup.
Not in its public materials. Stylement includes 12-season color analysis, a client palette page, and an in-store Delta-E color scanner.
Both support teams. GoodPix describes a team tier for up to 10 users but does not publish its price; Stylement has a studio-team model billed per seat, published from $49 a month.
GoodPix is the more established platform among working pros, with fitting management and commission earning up to 25%, aimed at high-volume practices. It has been running longer and its members refer each other into it.
The first 25 studios lock in a lower rate for life. See the founding cohort